How is that this girl allowed to supervise Trump’s January 6 trial?
Yet one more prejudicial courtroom assertion made by Choose Tanya Chutkan in a January 6 case has been unearthed as Trump calls for she recuse herself from his January 6 case.
Julie Kelly obtained a transcript of one other sentencing by Choose Chutkan for a J6er the place she overtly lied in regards to the Capitol protest.
Choose Chutkan throughout her sentencing overtly lied in regards to the January 6 Capitol riot and known as it an “armed tried overthrow of this authorities.”
NEW CHUTKAN FILES: I simply obtained transcript of one other sentencing by Choose Chutkan for a J6er, convicted by her of 4 misdemeanors after a quick bench trial. To say her view of what occurred on January 6 is misinformed in an understatement.
It’s not hyperbole, it’s a lie: pic.twitter.com/pwxEjeLgBp
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 18, 2023
Choose Chutkan mentioned lawmakers who had been contained in the Capitol on January 6 regarded exterior and noticed “gallows being erected.”
This by no means occurred. There isn’t any video proof to again up this absurd declare.
After admitting she watched J6 choose committee hearings–and asking a defendant if he had, lol–Chutkan compares Jan 6 to Recreation of Thrones.
And nobody noticed anybody erecting gallows. There isn’t any video of it–and I have been making an attempt to hunt it down for two years with no luck. pic.twitter.com/KVQCEh4qNe
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) September 18, 2023
Choose Chutkan additionally mentioned January 6 protesters tried to violently overthrow the federal government.
She has already made up her thoughts on January 6 and but she is allowed to preside over Trump’s January 6 trial the place the previous president is dealing with 4 federal counts: Conspiracy to defraud the US, conspiracy to hinder an official continuing, obstruction of and try and hinder an official continuing, and conspiracy in opposition to rights.
President Trump’s attorneys final week filed a motion in a DC federal courtroom calling for Choose Tanya Chutkan, an Obama appointee, to recuse herself from Trump’s January 6 case introduced by Particular Counsel Jack Smith.
One instance of a disqualifying assertion per the movement filed final week:
In October 2022, earlier than the Particular Counsel’s appointment or the submitting of this case, Choose Chutkan acknowledged:
“This was nothing lower than an try and violently overthrow the federal government, the legally, lawfully, peacefully elected authorities by people who had been mad that their man misplaced. I see the videotapes. I see the footage of the flags and the indicators that folks had been carrying and the hats they had been sporting and the garb. And the individuals who mobbed that Capitol had been there in fealty, in loyalty, to at least one man — to not the Structure, of which most people who come earlier than me appear woefully ignorant; to not the beliefs of this nation; and to not the ideas of democracy. It’s a blind loyalty to at least one one that, by the best way, stays free to at the present time.” United States v. Christine Priola 1:22-cr-242, ECF #66 at 29:17–30:3 (sentencing transcript) (emphasis added) (related parts connected as Ex. A).
Choose Tanya Chutkan is treating President Trump worse than other defendants – together with a meth vendor.
Famous legal professional Techno Fog regarded by way of Choose Chutkan’s latest historical past and supplied proof of bias after she denied the gag order hearing dates requested by Trump’s attorneys.
She gave the meth vendor a 1 week deadline to answer a protecting order.
The decide additionally set the listening to 2 weeks out after it was submitted, in response to Techno Fog.
In distinction, Choose Chutkan gave Trump solely ONE DAY to answer a request for a protecting order.
That is clear proof of bias.
Mark Levin made a wonderful case in favor of Tanya Chutkan’s recusal final week and mentioned she is “unqualified” to preside over Jack Smith’s case in opposition to Trump:
